Thursday, December 15, 2011

Holiday wishes to all my friends!

As we move from one year into the next, I wanted to take a moment and wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Yes, you heard me right, “Merry Christmas!” I don’t go for the “Happy Holidays” routine – so sue me if I am not politically correct.

Musically speaking, I have been working with a 6-7 piece jazz band called the “Paragons.” The band has a trumpet and a sax player, and plays mostly dance music such as swing, cha-chas, tangos, sambas and some vintage rock and roll. The musicians in the band are very talented and experienced, so working with this band is always a lot of fun.

I have a new hobby. I got back into ham radio (I got my first ham radio license in 1988) and I've taken tests the first Saturday of the last three months until I finally worked my way up to the top level, "Extra Class'" which is as high as you can go in ham radio. Now I am studying FEMA courses and am getting some "Incident Management System" certificates, and will be doing some volunteer work with the Sheriff’s office and some ham radio emergency communications organizations. Whenever the next disaster comes, I should be fully credentialed and will be helping out with disaster relief and emergency communications. I also built a web site (http://radio.tomsmerk.com) that I will be using to provide news about local ham radio groups and clubs. If you are interested in ham radio, scanners, shortwave listening, CB radio, GMRS or FRS, check out my web site and see what you think!

So, back to music. When I play with the Paragons, I've been playing my big jazz guitar most of the time, the Heritage Golden Eagle, and I’m using a neat little Fishman Loudbox amp, which is very small and light, but it has 60 watts of power so it works well with the bigger band.

I still maintain my performance schedule at http://musician.tomsmerk.com/gigs.html, so hopefully you will soon be able to come to one of my shows. Don’t forget to say “hi” when you come. If I can ever do anything for you, feel welcome to contact me at tom@tomsmerk.com.

Happy Holidays! (Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year!)

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Happy New Year 2011

Happy New Year. The year 2010 got busy toward the end, so I had less time to be a blogger. The new Rightside CD I mentioned earlier was finished on-schedule and is available at http://rightsideband.com. I also finished (finally) my own solo CD of praise and worship music. I started writing songs for that one back in 2007. For more information on “For The Faithful,” see http://musician.tomsmerk.com/forthefaithful.html. It is a collection of twelve praise and worship songs, including four originals. The rest of the songs are popular church hymns from "a few years ago," before all the modern music took over the worship service in the church. We sang some great timeless hymns back then, and I hope you will enjoy hearing some of them again.

I am currently writing and recording songs for my new CD, which will be an instrumental jazz recording featuring guitar. You can hear some samples of the new CD at http://musician.tomsmerk.com/tunes3.html. So far, I have identified seventeen songs for the album. Now I am thinking that maybe I should find three more songs and then do two CDs with ten songs on each. Or maybe I will go ahead and record all seventeen, then pick the best twelve to fifteen songs to be included on the new CD.

Recently, I have launched a new Facebook page to promote my music. Please follow the page at http://www.facebook.com/tomsmerkmusic. If you are a Facebook user, be sure to click the “Like” button so that you will receive updates of all the posts. Also on Facebook, I am trying to promote a “Facebook Group” named “Backstage Chat.” It is intended to be a place where musicians, entertainers, songwriters, speakers, concert promoters and support staff, music teachers, etc. can have a place to hang out and share information, stories-from-the-road, tips, advice, useful information, announcements, etc. Picture yourself walking in to a room where many of your favorite local or national entertainers are sitting around on sofas or at tables, relaxing, and "talking shop." The Internet makes this possible, and I'm hoping a lot of entertainers find this page and are willing to share a sense of community, from seasoned veterans with a lot of advice to share, to newbies looking for all the resources they can latch on to. A group FOR musicians BY musicians! Please check it out!

I am going to be trying out a new way of delivering my music a local small venue concerts such as coffee houses and open mics. I just recently purchased a new acoustic guitar amplifier, a Fishman LoudBox Mini. It is actually more than an acoustic guitar amplifier – it is a 3 channel system that includes a connector to plug in my iPod (or CD player) for my backing tracks, a guitar channel with a phase switch for acoustic guitar, and a microphone channel with XLR input. Both channels have separate reverb level controls, and the guitar channel also has a nice chorus effect. Each channel has separate volume and tone controls, and the tone controls are active, meaning that if the bass knob is set half way, it is set to “neutral,” or effectively not in use, and then turning it up adds bass and turning it down cuts bass. This allows me to get a perfect tone out of both my guitar and microphone. The aux input for my iPod doesn’t have any controls, it goes right to the master volume, but the tone is perfect without any modification (a credit to the iPod) and I can regulate the volume on the iPod itself. The tone on the guitar channel is excellent for both acoustic and electric guitar. I plan to set up one of each – my Martin D42 K2 for acoustic and my Heritage Golden Eagle for jazz, and then connect them with an A/B box to switch between the guitars. The amplifier has 60 watts of power, and it actually sounds like 60 watts. The whole amp is very small and light, so this new setup should make it very easy to set up for gigs. Plus, my sound will be more consistent from gig to gig since I will be using the same rig and not have to rely on house systems. If I need more volume, the amp includes a direct output (XLR) to plug it right in to the house system! I’m very excited about the possibilities. I think people will be amazed when they hear how much sound comes from this small amp. I will be using it for the first time on January 14, 2011 at Friendly Grounds Coffee in Santee. Show is from 6-7:30PM – I hope you can make it!

My wife, Peggy, had some health problems just before Christmas, so we went to Las Vegas for a week to rest up and have some fun. The Aria Resort & Casino in the new City Center development comped us one of the nicest suites we have ever stayed it. It was a “corner” suite, and had great views of the strip from every room. Even the bath tub sat surrounded by windows for a nice view while you soaked, but I didn’t have time to try it out. After a few days at the Aria, we moved to the Wynn Resort. Next to Bellagio, the Wynn is probably my favorite hotel and casino in Las Vegas. We had a wonderful stay at the Wynn, and also spent some time looking at the nice Christmas decorations at the Bellagio Hotel. We also checked out the new “Cosmopolitan” Resort & Casino which opened just a few days before we arrived. This brand new addition to the strip looks like it is also one of the fanciest,

Back home from Las Vegas, we enjoyed Christmas at home by ourselves, and then enjoyed the company of friends at two different New Year’s Eve parties.

Plans for the New Year are simple – keep working on the new jazz CD until it is finished, play the gigs I have scheduled, and try to get more paid gigs with other bands. I’ve already begun to accomplish that goal by securing a dance job with the Paragon Jazz Band in February. I’ve worked with this band before, and am looking forward to seeing some of my old friends again.

Until I get a chance to write more articles for my blog, I hope you will keep in touch other ways. Here is a list of the many ways you can remain a part of my life:

Website: http://musician.tomsmerk.com
Other Websites: http://tomsmerk.com
Music Blog: http://guitarwisdom.blogspot.com
Personal Blog: http://tomsmerk.blogspot.com
Music Page on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tomsmerkmusic
Personal Page on Facebook: http://facebook.com/tsmerk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/tsmerk
Email: tom@tomsmerk.com
San Diego Reader Page: http://www.sandiegoreader.com/bands/tom-smerk
Rightside band web site: http://rightsideband.com


Keep in touch!

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Your songs don't sound the same, why should they look the same?

I was watching a Tom Jackson video recently. Tom Jackson’s work as a Live Music Producer has helped shape the public presentation of many of today’s artists from the stage. Originally from the LA area, he is now based in the Nashville area.

One of Tom’s comments from his video presentation was “Not all of your songs sound the same, why should they look the same?” After thinking about this observation for a while, I’ve decided that this is a big part in making the difference between an amateur music performance and a professional show.

Whether you work as a single or a band, there are many things you can do to keep your performance visually varied. If you are a singer, you have the choice of using a microphone stand or holding the microphone. M ix it up. Even within the same song, you could start out with the mic on the stand and then take it out and hold it as the song builds dynamically.

Another bit of visual variety that can be added is the use of a stool. Sit on the slow, soft songs, stand up on the more exciting stuff, and move around a little when the song really starts to build. You could start off a song sitting on the stool and then get up and place the stool behind you when the song picks up steam.

And when you decide to not use the stool or microphone stand, even the way you move it out of your way can show professionalism. Be quick and decisive about getting the stool or stand behind you, and don’t linger or stumble with the process.

Some props can also add visual variety. Hats, sunglasses, rubber noses, funny neckties or bowties, etc. are some examples. Don’t be corny, but rather, be tasteful when using prop gimmicks because they could backfire and make your act look cheap and amateur.

Move around on stage for visual variety. Sign part of the song from the right of the stage and part from the left. Return “home” to the center of the stage. Walk across the stage slowly as you sing on slower songs, of walk quickly and decisively to get from one point to another on the livelier songs. Or you can sing an entire song from the left, and then later in the show, sing an entire song from the right.

Body movement and “steps” can add some visual variety, but don’t try to do full-on Motown choreography unless that is what your act is all about. Just a simple side step to the left followed by a step to the right will suffice. Or you could just stand in one place and turn your body to the right or left. Little hand jesters such as a wave or a finger snap can help.

Where are you looking when you are on stage? Add visual variety by looking at different things and different places. Look at the front row of the audience. Look toward the back of the house. Look at another band member and share a smile or a head nod. Don’t just stand there all night looking at some noon-existent dead spot in the distance like a lot of performers do. Sometimes you can’t really see the audience because of the lights, but that shouldn’t change any of the above. Just try to see past the lights, or pretend that you can see.

There is more I could add, but I just wanted to get you started thinking about how you could apply this to your own band. Every act is unique and individual, so what works for one act won’t work for another, and not all this information I presented today will work for everyone. We can use the “comment” feature of this blog to share additional visual gimmicks that have been successful for you in the past. While I thank Tom Jackson for getting me thinking about this topic, I wanted to mention that all these ideas were my own from past experience, and although some are so common they might mirror things Tom has said, I had no intention of plagiarizing his teachings.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

New CD project underway

Saturday, February 20, 2010 found me in the “Upper Room” recording studio in Santee, CA to add the guitar parts to the new CD by “Rightside,” a local 9-piece gospel group that plays in the country rock style. I returned March 2 to finish the recording. The new CD is scheduled for release in April or May, and at this point, all seems to be on schedule. The CD will be titled "Living on the Rightside," and a special CD release party concert is scheduled for Saturday, May 22, 2010 at Pathways Community Church on Carlton Hills Blvd. in Santee, CA. A guest band (tba) will open the show.

The CD will include ten cover tunes, no originals, and the songs on the CD are:
Give It Away
Eagle Song
Rightside Of The Dirt
How Long
I’m Loving Life
Have You Traveled With The Lord Lately
Wine Into Water
Living For The Moment
Get Up In Jesus Name
Keep Walkin’

I listened to the last CD from Rightside, which was recorded at least two years ago, and this one should be significantly better for several reasons: one extra tenor singer, the last CD had no guitar player, plus the obvious fact that the musicians have gotten better over the last two years and the vocal blend is now much tighter and more rehearsed.

I was able to do two takes of all 10 songs in about two hours. I plan to make a return booking next month to re-do one of my guitar solos and to add acoustic guitar parts on three of the songs using my Martin D42. This first time, I used my Carvin AE-185 to play both the electric and the acoustic guitar parts, and I was impressed how well the Carvin sounded as an acoustic instrument because it has such a small, thin body. I used a BOSS GT-10 guitar processor to enhance the acoustic sound. I also used the GT-10 on the other tracks for amp and cabinet simulation. Rather than renting a selection of choice amps, the amp simulation on the BOSS GT-10 is so good, I just plugged directly into the mixer.

Another thing I did different is to record using the same GT-10 patches that I use for live performance. Usually I will record the guitar track “dry” (without any EQ or effects) and add effects and EQ during the mixing process. I decided to simplify the process this time by leaving the effects (compression, echo, reverb, chorus, EQ, etc.) in the patch because I had spent so much time setting up the patches in the first place. The recorded sound should be ideal, and will require no more of an adjustment other than leveling with the other tracks. The other thing I left off the recording was volume adjustments, which is the way I always record. I played the whole track at the same volume, and will trust the engineer, Jim, to work some parts into the background and to bring out the intros and the solos a little more.

Speaking of Jim Burnett, owner, engineer and producer of the Upper Room recording studio, he did an excellent job getting all the takes recorded. He obviously knew his equipment inside and out, and was very patient, cheerful and confident in doing his job. Beginning artists should trust the engineer and producer to make them sound as good as possible, and talented hands and ears can sometimes make poor musicians sound good. But when you’ve been around the block as many times as I have, you worry about just the opposite happening, you think “I played my butt off, now is this going to come through in the mix or is he going to muck it up somehow?” Well, if Jim does as good a job with the mixing as he did with the tracking, I’m sure I’ll be happy with the results.

The songs on the CD were all good choices and display a nice variety of vocal and instrumental talent. I enjoyed playing all the songs, and I hope this enthusiasm is captured in what you hear when the CD is released in April or May. We’ll be doing the photography on Saturday, March 27. The mixing should be almost finished by then. I can’t wait to hear the finished product, and I hope you all will pick up a copy also! All the profits from the CD will go to missionary work!

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Develop a "Signature Sound" - Part 2

As a follow-up from our previous discussion, I would like to discuss how equipment (guitar, amp, effects) could have a strong influence on your “signature sound.” To begin, let’s look at a few well known guitarists and see how their equipment was largely or partly responsible for the sound.

The first that comes to mind is Duane Eddy. If you haven’t heard of Duane Eddy, he had some great instrumental hits in the late fifties and the early sixties such as Rebel Rouser, The Lonely One, Forty Miles of Bad Road, Peter Gunn and Because They’re Young. Many of his album titles contained the word “twang,” a word used to describe the crisp, clear hollow treble sound of his guitar as he picked out the melodies. This “twang” sound was due largely to the Gretsch Chet Atkins 6120 guitar that Duane Eddy used to record these hits. Later, when Eddy became an endorser for Guild guitars, the Guild Duane Eddy models took care to copy the characteristics of the Gretsch that gave the guitar this distinctive “twang” sound. Duane Eddy eventually returned to the Gretsch guitar. That same Gretsch 6120 “twang” would later become a trademark of rockabilly artist Brian Setzer, and George Harrison’s Gretsch Chet Atkins Country Gentleman tone could be easily recognized in early recordings by the Beatles.

Speaking of the Gretsch Chet Atkins guitar, Chet Atkins himself had a distinctive signature sound that was a combination of his intricate fingerpicking technique and the tone of the Gretsch guitar which he helped design.

Les Paul worked with Gibson guitar engineers to design the world famous Gibson Les Paul series of guitars, and it was the sound of the massively dense Gibson Les Paul guitar combined with the tape echo effects which Les Paul also pioneered in the recording field that made Les Paul songs instantly recognizable.

In the late sixties, John Mayall and Fleetwood Mac guitarist Peter Green became associated with one particular 1959 Gibson Les Paul Standard guitar that had a unique sound because one of the pickups was installed backwards.

Contemporary smooth jazz artist Craig Chaquico gets his signature sound from a thin acoustic electric guitar that he helped design with the Carvin company, and his signature sound created by using this guitar is further personified by using effects such as chorus.

The sound that launched the career of legendary guitarist Carlos Santana came from early Mesa Boogie guitar amps, a company that grew from a Fender Princeton amp that was modified by Mesa Engineering founder Randall Smith.

Blues guitar legend B.B. King relies so much on his Gibson ES-355 guitar for his sound that he has given his guitar a name, Lucille, and treats it as a family member! Other guitarists that were associated with the tone of hollow body Gibson electrics were Chuck Berry (Gibson ES-350 and ES-355) and Elvis Presley’s guitarist Scotty Moore (Gibson L5, Super 400CES and ES 295).

Joe Walsh and Peter Frampton are associated with solos using the “talk box” effect, a rubber hose which is attached to a speaker driver and sends the guitar amp output into your mouth cavity to manipulate. Jimi Hendrix got much of his sound from the Dallas Arbiter Fuzz Face while the whole “fuzz tone” industry was introduced to guitarists by Keith Richards’ use of the Gibson Maestro Fuzz Tone on the Rolling Stones hit “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction.”

Once you begin to recognize the importance of equipment on developing and shaping your signature sound, you should realize that jazz great Wes Montgomery would not sound the same if he played a Fender Stratocaster through a Marshall amp stack instead of his Gibson L5 CES, Merle Haggard and Buck Owens would not have achieved their signature sounds with Gibson ES-335 guitars instead of their Fender Telecasters, and smooth jazz guitarist Peter White may not have enjoyed the same huge success playing a steel string acoustic electric instead of his nylon string electric guitar.

Many guitar manufacturers such as Gibson, Epiphone, Gretsch, Fender, Paul Reed Smith and Ibanez have models in their line bearing the name of the artists that made them popular, such as the Ibanez Steve Vai JEM models, Joe Pass JP20 and George Benson GB10, the Fender Eric Clapton and Eric Johnson Stratocasters, the Gretsch Brian Setzer model guitars, the Epiphone Al Caiola, and the Gibson Herb Ellis and Barney Kessel guitars.

Some popular guitar amplifiers that are sought after because of their distinctive sounds that have been recognized by leading guitarists are the Marshall 50 watt and 100 watt stack, the Fender Showman and Dual Showman (Dick Dale and many other `60’s surf groups), Vox AC30 (Beatles), Roland JC-120 Jazz Chorus, Fender “Blackface” amps such as the Princeton Reverb, Deluxe Reverb and Twin Reverb, and the older Fender Tweed amps.

If you listen to enough recordings, you will probably find a guitarist that you can associate with each of the popular guitar effects, such as wah pedal, flanger, echo/delay, overdrive/distortion, and others.

In closing out the series on how to develop a signature sound, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that many popular guitarists were associated with techniques or actions that became part of their signature sound, or at least part of the overall package. For example, I am referring to the famous Chuck Berry “duck walk,” the tapping technique of Eddie Van Halen, the touch tapping of Jimmy Webster and Stanley Jordan, the “octave” playing of Wes Montgomery, the “chicken pickin`” technique of many country lead guitarists such as Johnny Hiland, the speed of Jimmy Bryant, billed as the “Fastest Guitar in the Country,” the finger style technique of Merle Travis, the flat picking of Maybelle Carter, the string bending of Gram Parsons and Clarence White, the black clothing of Johnny Cash, the flashy stage wardrobe of Elvis Presley, the “Nudie suits” of many popular country artists in the `60’s, the tall hat of Slash, and many other examples or artists who partially relied on technique, actions and dress to achieve notoriety. Soooo, will you be able to play better if you wear a fancy hat? Of course not. I just wanted to point out that while you are going through all of this effort to establish a "signature sound," you might want to consider wherther a "signature look" is right for you or not!

If you are not familiar with any of the guitarists, guitars, amps or effects mentioned in this article, I urge you to do some online research to become familiar with the examples I referred to. To gain the most understanding of how guitar artists rely on particular guitars, amps, effects and techniques to achieve their signature sound, it is important to be able to recognize the association that was made through these examples.

Tuesday, February 09, 2010

Develop a "Signature Sound"

I imagine most of you reading this can listen to a guitar player or solo on the radio or from a CD and instantly recognize the player as being Carlos Santana or Eric Clapton or Jeff Beck or B.B King or Duane Eddy or Scotty Moore. These are six great players that are not only well known, but they are well known for their unique “signature sound.” They don’t sound like anyone else and nobody else sounds like them.

How does one begin to develop a signature sound? Well, I have a few ideas to present to get you thinking along these lines. My theory is that there are essentially four ways a player develops a signature sound. Method 1 is without a doubt the best way to go about this. The guitarist is well schooled, well trained and well rehearsed, and has been developing the art of guitar playing for many years in a variety of bands and recording situations. Perhaps they have gone through a period of working as a studio musician and/or have become well known for being an important part of two of more well known bands. These players are so good that they can sound like anybody. The can imitate Santana or Clapton or Beck or King or Eddy or Moore. But they choose not to. Instead, they prefer to interpret the songs they record and perform in their own way, changing whatever is necessary about the arrangement until they arrive at a “feel” that is exactly what they were looking for on that song. This approach produces some great players who play with “feeling” and “personality.” The put a whole lot of themselves into the song, and the result cries “this is what I am trying to say and this is how I want to present this song to you.”

Needless to say, this method of developing a signature sound comes only with years of experience. Another method is just the opposite. In method 2, the player is very inexperienced and has not yet developed the ability to play as well as the other masters of his genre, but for some reason, his band became famous before they became accomplished musicians. This person’s playing is crude, unrefined and does not show an example of years of training and practicing. Yet, the songs are “catchy” and have become hits regardless of the lack of talent, and the guitarist is now famous for this “untrained” sound. Some of the “punk” bands of the `70’s are good examples of this “signature style.” We recognize the guitarist from the band and the song, the song is appealing, maybe crude and maybe not, but the guitarist’s style is a perfect fit for this band’s songs. Later, the guitarist might work with other bands and continue to use this “signature sound,” since it has been good to his career so far!

The third method I have in mind is rather unique, but you can easily find examples of players that have followed this approach if you do a little research. In this method, a player might be largely self-taught, perhaps getting help and advice from teachers along the way, or perhaps ignoring help and advice from teachers. The player creates original material, perhaps in combination with other players. They might form a band, and then rather than learning “cover songs,” they immediately go to work on original material, with each player contributing to what the end result should sound like. After doing this or a few dozen songs, the band begins to play some shows and perhaps gets a record contract. Now, for what makes this method unique; the members of the band don’t really care to listen to other music, and are not interested to comparing their music to any other artists nor do they wish to become part of a genre. The only music they recognize is that which they create. All other styles and influences remain foreign to them, unheard and unrecognized. They “shut out” other artists and are thoroughly engrossed in their own original, unique style of writing and performing songs. If they by any chance should happen to “cover” a song, it will sound very different from the original. Perhaps only the lyrics remain, or maybe also some of the original chord progression.

The fourth method of developing a signature sound is probably the most common. The multitude of players do not fit any of these first three methods because they (1) are not super talented and have many years of experience like the players described in method one; (2) they are serious students of the guitar and want to learn to play a combination of styles as well as possible, so they have progressed far beyond those described in method two; and (3) they don’t isolate themselves from other music and are open to many styles and seek influence from many great players, unlike those described in method three.

Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that any guitarist that doesn’t fit in any of the first three methods is automatically included in method four. Most of the remaining guitarists that do not fit any of the first three methods do not actually have a signature sound, so they are excluded from even method four because there is nothing unique to identify them from many other struggling guitarists. They are good players, but they are a dime a dozen. They are good enough that you would want this person in your band, and they would make your band sound better, but they simply don’t have a “signature sound!” Most guitarists go the whole way through their playing career without developing a signature sound. That doesn’t make them any less important, it only makes them less identifiable.

The fourth category of players has developed a signature sound as a “project.” It didn’t evolve naturally as in method one, by luck as in method two, or by design as in method three. The few guitarists that evolve from method four do so because they desire a signature sound, even though they haven’t “earned” one. They are skilled enough that they are aware what they sound like. They might be able to compare their playing to other musicians. The can probably lay down a good Clapton lick on one song and switch to a Santana feel for another song. The players in the fourth category are probably familiar with everything I’ve written about so far, they realize the importance of having an identifiable sound, and they simple set out to create a sound that will become their signature sound. Often, this happens along with the other members of the band changing their sound as well to fit the new signature sound. The new sound might be attached to a different style of playing, it might be taking the music that is currently being played and “bumping it up a notch” on the scale of musical standards, or it might just be a slight alteration of the player’s current style. Sometimes the new “signature sound” might be based on the sound of a favorite player, but with a “twist” that makes it unique. It is difficult to just sit down and “invent” a signature sound, but it can be done, and it has been done by many top guitarists throughout music history.

One last comment before I close; I’m not saying that you need to develop a signature sound in order to become a good accomplished guitarist. If nothing else, there is one concept I would like you to consider for each song you are playing now and also for each new song you learn, and that is this: “How would YOU play this song?” Think for a moment about what I just said. If this is an original song, YOU get to invent the guitar part. How do YOU think the guitar should sound on this song? What do YOU think the guitar should play? If it is a cover song, then the nature of your band will probably dictate whether you should play the guitar part note-for-note from the original recording, or better yet, will the band allow you to do your “interpretation” of the song? What I mean by that is that I already know how Clapton played the song, but I didn’t come to hear Clapton, I came to hear YOU! How will YOU play the song? What can YOU add to the song that Clapton may have overlooked? I have heard many guitarists cover a song from a super-star guitarist, and they have no chance of ever getting their solos and fills to sound as good as the original, but they we still able to make the song likable by being unique and putting a lot of their own feel into the song so that even though it might not have been a technical masterpiece of guitar wizardry like the original, it still sounds likable!

As always, I am interested in hearing any comments you might have about what I write. You may agree or disagree, but let’s have some fun and discuss these topics in the comments section! Thanks for checking in each week!

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Getting the “Right Sound” – Part 3

Picking up on where we left off last month, I have since moved up to the next level (well, actually the top level) and I wanted to share some of my thoughts about this. After working with the BOSS FDR-1 “Fender Deluxe Reverb” pedal, I became fascinated by how you can obtain the sound of a particular guitar amp without having to lug that amp around. The FDR-1 pedal did a great job of making my guitar sound like I was playing through a Fender Deluxe Reverb.

Now that I am learning a large variety of songs for this new band, “Rightside,” I discovered that most of the guitarists I am emulating (copying?) don’t play through a Deluxe Reverb. In addition to having to get the sound of 25 different amps, I also have to contend with the fact that they are all using different makes and models of guitars, and a variety of pedal effects such as delay, reverb, chorus, EQ and compression.

After doing some intensive research along with the band’s manager, we discovered the perfect solution – the “BOSSS GT-10 Guitar Effects Processor.” The GT-10 is a large pedalboard, AC powered, which contains a number of footswitches and a pedal controller. It contains “patch” storage memory which holds the original 200 factory pre-set patches, and room for 200 user created patches. The patches are stored in 100 “banks” (50 factory preset banks and 50 user banks) and each bank contains four patches. There is a wheel control to scroll through the patches, but since the unit was designed to be a floor board, the convenient method of changing patches is to step on either one switch to go forward from bank to bank, or a second switch to change backward from bank to bank. Once the correct bank is accessed, you will then step on one of four switches to access each of the four patches in that bank.

If that sounds complicated, it’s really not. I found that I really only needed about 32 different sounds, so I stored them in the first eight banks. I’m never more than eight pedal clicks away from my sound. To make it easier to change patches in the middle of the song, it stays on the previous patch setting until you do the very last step of activating one of the four patch selectors in the selected bank.

Now, for the fun part. Creating a new patch for yourself is like going to a music store and deciding what you need to have to get the sound you want – only the whole music store in built into the GT-10 pedal! You start by deciding what type of guitar you want to sound like – humbuckers, single-coil pickups, single coil “half-sound” (like a Strat), or acoustic guitar. Next, pick and amp “head” to play through. If you select a “combo” amp such as a Twin Reverb or a Tweed Bassman, you can either go with the “stock” speaker configuration, or you can select just about any speaker configuration from one 8” up to eight 12” speakers. Surprisingly, one 15” speaker (one of my favorites) is not available.

Next step is to pick a microphone to put in front of the cabinet, decide if you want to center the mic on the speaker or put it off center, then set the mic volume. Now that you have a basic guitar and amp sound, you can begin turning the knobs on the guitar and on the amp to adjust the sound, including gain and volume combinations. You can even set a different setting for amp channel “B.”

Now you can add in the standard effect sounds, each readily available from a button on the top of the unit – compression, reverb, chorus, EQ, overdrive and delay. You can adjust the settings of each effect, and assign it to an off/on footswitch if you want it to be selectable. There are also two multi-effects processors available, FX1 and FX2, where you can select from a long list of just about every stomp box effect pedal ever made. Some examples of what is available is phase shifter, flanger, tremolo, rotary speaker, uni-vibe, octave, acoustic guitar simulator, sitar simulator, jazz bas simulator, wah pedal, auto wah, and many more, about 34 in all! You get to pick any two from the list in addition to the six “basic” pedal effects mentioned previously for a total of eight simultaneous effects! Think of what it would cost you to purchase eight of your favorite effects pedals, and the $499.95 street price of the BOSS GT-10 starts to look like a real bargain! Once you have finished the patch, you must press the “write” button to store the patch into memory. Free librarian software is available from the BOSS web site to help you backup, rearrange and manage our patches. There is also an online “user group” where you can download and exchange patches with other users. I tried some patches from other users, and they were nice, but they did not fit with the songs I am performing. I think every user will have their own unique tone requirements, and that is where this unit really shines – the ability to easily create or modify a patch!

The pedal controller can be used as a volume pedal, a wah pedal, a patch changer, or to vary one of the available parameters in any of the settings. There are two outputs if you want to run the unit in stereo through two amps or two channels of the mixer. You can have the amp “A” sound on one channel and the “B” sound on the other! Stereo effects such as echo would bounce between the two channels!

There are many more feature of this unit that may be of interest, such as a USB connector which allows you to either download or backup patches, or you can use the GT-10 at the front end of a digital recording (DAW) system. There are MIDI connectors so that the patches and parameters can be changed automatically from a sequencer, and there is a digital output as well as the two ¼” guitar jacks. There is a headphones jack (of course), and effects loop to allow you to use additional effects pedals, a connector that allows you to add two additional switches to turn effects off and on (for a total of four!). If you have a two channel amp that uses a footswitch to switch channels, you can even do your amp switching from within the GT-10!

You can create sound-on-sound loops with onboard Phrase Loop function. A loop can be up to 38 seconds in length.

I should also mention that the GT-10 is driven by BOSS’ latest custom-made DSP and proprietary sound-modeling COSM® engine, so the sounds that are “simulated” are very authentic. When not plugged directly into the house mixer, I usually play through a 1967 Fender Twin Reverb amp. Previous to the Twin, I was using a 1966 Fender Pro Reverb. When I “model” these amps using the GT-10, I can tell you from experience that if I didn’t know better, I’d swear that I was still plugged into the Fender!

Now, if the band throws a song at me and the guitar player has a distinctive sound that drives the song, I don’t have to sit back a listen to the complaint “your guitar doesn’t sound right for that song!”